<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: TeraCopy 2.05 beta</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.codesector.com/2009/07/13/teracopy-2-05/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.codesector.com/2009/07/13/teracopy-2-05/</link>
	<description>Software news and reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 07:31:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: azsazfdchd</title>
		<link>http://blog.codesector.com/2009/07/13/teracopy-2-05/comment-page-1/#comment-1803</link>
		<dc:creator>azsazfdchd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2009 15:39:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.codesector.com/?p=182#comment-1803</guid>
		<description>ghdshghdrfebdbdgfb fggfsbgfgbazwdtqdetxsyrsjryxfqqqqjuqsfgrsk  dsdgfqsjaqsddhszhsfgqj                                                     tdktgfgtfrghfufrfrfyurtrrffrskjvbxw&lt;zyti</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ghdshghdrfebdbdgfb fggfsbgfgbazwdtqdetxsyrsjryxfqqqqjuqsfgrsk  dsdgfqsjaqsddhszhsfgqj                                                     tdktgfgtfrghfufrfrfyurtrrffrskjvbxw&lt;zyti</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: daster</title>
		<link>http://blog.codesector.com/2009/07/13/teracopy-2-05/comment-page-1/#comment-1714</link>
		<dc:creator>daster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 17:53:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.codesector.com/?p=182#comment-1714</guid>
		<description>If i enable the new system write cache on windows7 x64, with avira antivirus, the copy speed doubles from 22mb/s to 50mb/s</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If i enable the new system write cache on windows7 x64, with avira antivirus, the copy speed doubles from 22mb/s to 50mb/s</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zander</title>
		<link>http://blog.codesector.com/2009/07/13/teracopy-2-05/comment-page-1/#comment-1693</link>
		<dc:creator>Zander</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 08:27:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.codesector.com/?p=182#comment-1693</guid>
		<description>@Ben
Yeah, I&#039;m using it this very moment to move some files around on Server 2008 R2 (64-bit only). Works fine except it seems to butt heads with Symantec Corporate...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Ben<br />
Yeah, I&#8217;m using it this very moment to move some files around on Server 2008 R2 (64-bit only). Works fine except it seems to butt heads with Symantec Corporate&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Serebin</title>
		<link>http://blog.codesector.com/2009/07/13/teracopy-2-05/comment-page-1/#comment-1692</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Serebin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 04:40:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.codesector.com/?p=182#comment-1692</guid>
		<description>Does Teracopy support server OSes (e.g. Windows 2003 and 2008)? Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does Teracopy support server OSes (e.g. Windows 2003 and 2008)? Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: don Sussman</title>
		<link>http://blog.codesector.com/2009/07/13/teracopy-2-05/comment-page-1/#comment-1691</link>
		<dc:creator>don Sussman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 23:51:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.codesector.com/?p=182#comment-1691</guid>
		<description>The download of the beta version has a virus</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The download of the beta version has a virus</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Green</title>
		<link>http://blog.codesector.com/2009/07/13/teracopy-2-05/comment-page-1/#comment-1690</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Green</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 18:30:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.codesector.com/?p=182#comment-1690</guid>
		<description>Just a suggestion but what about a skip identical option.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just a suggestion but what about a skip identical option.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ashok Raut</title>
		<link>http://blog.codesector.com/2009/07/13/teracopy-2-05/comment-page-1/#comment-1689</link>
		<dc:creator>Ashok Raut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 11:14:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.codesector.com/?p=182#comment-1689</guid>
		<description>Please provide beta version in ZIP format</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please provide beta version in ZIP format</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Prasad Upasani</title>
		<link>http://blog.codesector.com/2009/07/13/teracopy-2-05/comment-page-1/#comment-1687</link>
		<dc:creator>Prasad Upasani</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 19:20:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.codesector.com/?p=182#comment-1687</guid>
		<description>Anyone else having problems with 2.05 on Win 7 RC x64? It installed fine for me but its not showing up as the default copy handler and missing the context menu as well. 2.01 did not have this issue though it had its own share of bugs. 

Note I uninstalled 2.01 and then did a clean reinstall of 2.05 ..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone else having problems with 2.05 on Win 7 RC x64? It installed fine for me but its not showing up as the default copy handler and missing the context menu as well. 2.01 did not have this issue though it had its own share of bugs. </p>
<p>Note I uninstalled 2.01 and then did a clean reinstall of 2.05 ..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://blog.codesector.com/2009/07/13/teracopy-2-05/comment-page-1/#comment-1686</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 11:49:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.codesector.com/?p=182#comment-1686</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote cite=&quot;#commentbody-1683&quot;&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-1683&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Michael&lt;/a&gt; :&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;blockquote cite=&quot;#commentbody-1681&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-1681&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Tommy &lt;/a&gt; :&lt;/strong&gt;what about using inno setup?&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.jrsoftware.org/isinfo.php&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.jrsoftware.org/isinfo.php&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If you’re suggesting installers, then why not also suggest NSI: &lt;a href=&quot;http://nsis.sourceforge.net/Main_Page&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://nsis.sourceforge.net/Main_Page&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Thanks, I&#039;m already using InnoSetup and NSI (for portable version). So you can use these parameters when installing: http://help.codesector.com/InnoSetup</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote cite="#commentbody-1683"><p>
<strong><a href="#comment-1683" rel="nofollow">Michael</a> :</strong></p>
<blockquote cite="#commentbody-1681"><p>
<strong><a href="#comment-1681" rel="nofollow">Tommy </a> :</strong>what about using inno setup?<a href="http://www.jrsoftware.org/isinfo.php" rel="nofollow">http://www.jrsoftware.org/isinfo.php</a></p>
</blockquote>
<p>If you’re suggesting installers, then why not also suggest NSI: <a href="http://nsis.sourceforge.net/Main_Page" rel="nofollow">http://nsis.sourceforge.net/Main_Page</a></p>
</blockquote>
<p>Thanks, I&#8217;m already using InnoSetup and NSI (for portable version). So you can use these parameters when installing: <a href="http://help.codesector.com/InnoSetup" rel="nofollow">http://help.codesector.com/InnoSetup</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: toh</title>
		<link>http://blog.codesector.com/2009/07/13/teracopy-2-05/comment-page-1/#comment-1685</link>
		<dc:creator>toh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 11:28:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.codesector.com/?p=182#comment-1685</guid>
		<description>I would like to make a request.
There is feature - rename/rename all for the files with the similar filename.

It would be useful to have also: backup/backup all, so that the original files will be renamed to something like &quot;filename.exe.bak&quot; (or moved to the folder &quot;backup&quot;, created in the same directory)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would like to make a request.<br />
There is feature &#8211; rename/rename all for the files with the similar filename.</p>
<p>It would be useful to have also: backup/backup all, so that the original files will be renamed to something like &#8220;filename.exe.bak&#8221; (or moved to the folder &#8220;backup&#8221;, created in the same directory)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->
