<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: TeraCopy 1.25 beta</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.codesector.com/2007/09/14/teracopy-125-beta/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.codesector.com/2007/09/14/teracopy-125-beta/</link>
	<description>Software news and reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 11:41:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: bella</title>
		<link>http://blog.codesector.com/2007/09/14/teracopy-125-beta/comment-page-1/#comment-2142</link>
		<dc:creator>bella</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 23:08:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.codesector.com/?p=8#comment-2142</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-1407&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@Daniel M. Salazar &lt;/a&gt; 
no not really</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-1407" rel="nofollow">@Daniel M. Salazar </a><br />
no not really</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bella</title>
		<link>http://blog.codesector.com/2007/09/14/teracopy-125-beta/comment-page-1/#comment-2141</link>
		<dc:creator>bella</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 23:08:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.codesector.com/?p=8#comment-2141</guid>
		<description>sup yha this is the best doc</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sup yha this is the best doc</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel M. Salazar</title>
		<link>http://blog.codesector.com/2007/09/14/teracopy-125-beta/comment-page-1/#comment-1407</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel M. Salazar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 02:37:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.codesector.com/?p=8#comment-1407</guid>
		<description>Programms...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Programms&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel M. Salazar</title>
		<link>http://blog.codesector.com/2007/09/14/teracopy-125-beta/comment-page-1/#comment-1406</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel M. Salazar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 02:37:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.codesector.com/?p=8#comment-1406</guid>
		<description>Congratulations Jeff,
One of the best programm ever.

Scripting? Its just an idea

Regards,</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congratulations Jeff,<br />
One of the best programm ever.</p>
<p>Scripting? Its just an idea</p>
<p>Regards,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lee</title>
		<link>http://blog.codesector.com/2007/09/14/teracopy-125-beta/comment-page-1/#comment-1249</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 00:18:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.codesector.com/?p=8#comment-1249</guid>
		<description>I really like teracopy also.  But I would like an answer to one of the questions teedog asked in item #29 in the above list:

&gt;What guideline or method should we use to choose the ideal buffer size?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really like teracopy also.  But I would like an answer to one of the questions teedog asked in item #29 in the above list:</p>
<p>&gt;What guideline or method should we use to choose the ideal buffer size?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lancelot</title>
		<link>http://blog.codesector.com/2007/09/14/teracopy-125-beta/comment-page-1/#comment-832</link>
		<dc:creator>Lancelot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 08:35:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.codesector.com/?p=8#comment-832</guid>
		<description>Great program, thanks.
XP 64 shell integration dont work with
teracopy125beta.exe

but works with teracopy2b364.exe, with another problem of mine. I put comments for teracopy2b364.exe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great program, thanks.<br />
XP 64 shell integration dont work with<br />
teracopy125beta.exe</p>
<p>but works with teracopy2b364.exe, with another problem of mine. I put comments for teracopy2b364.exe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://blog.codesector.com/2007/09/14/teracopy-125-beta/comment-page-1/#comment-688</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 11:56:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.codesector.com/?p=8#comment-688</guid>
		<description>Great program! May I suggest that there be an option to enable automatic checksum calculation and comparison for all copied files?
Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great program! May I suggest that there be an option to enable automatic checksum calculation and comparison for all copied files?<br />
Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steveg</title>
		<link>http://blog.codesector.com/2007/09/14/teracopy-125-beta/comment-page-1/#comment-670</link>
		<dc:creator>steveg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2008 03:57:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.codesector.com/?p=8#comment-670</guid>
		<description>had to uninstall teracopy for the reasons i listed above - as the default left click draganddrop copier, it just didn&#039;t work for me always copying small files - i could probably have lived with the superfluous context menu items, but both issues together catalyzed the uninstall - if i have a big copy job, i&#039;ll re-install then uninstall afterward, and will check back in sometime to see if these issues have been addressed in a future version

best wishes
steveg</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>had to uninstall teracopy for the reasons i listed above &#8211; as the default left click draganddrop copier, it just didn&#8217;t work for me always copying small files &#8211; i could probably have lived with the superfluous context menu items, but both issues together catalyzed the uninstall &#8211; if i have a big copy job, i&#8217;ll re-install then uninstall afterward, and will check back in sometime to see if these issues have been addressed in a future version</p>
<p>best wishes<br />
steveg</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steveg</title>
		<link>http://blog.codesector.com/2007/09/14/teracopy-125-beta/comment-page-1/#comment-660</link>
		<dc:creator>steveg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2008 16:33:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.codesector.com/?p=8#comment-660</guid>
		<description>hi jeff

just downloaded 2.2 beta and used it - very nice

but when i installed it, there were no options for which context menu handlers were installed - for instance, when i right click on the desktop or any folder, even with nothing selected, i get a context menu for teracopy - and menu doesn&#039;t do anything (nor would i expect it if nothing is selected) - i don&#039;t know what the purpose of having it always in the context menu is, but i&#039;d prefer to not have it there - and the only way i see to now to change that is with some registry editing, which might break other functionality - so maybe a detailed &quot;custom&quot; context menu association option on install, and the removal of non-functioning options like in the unselected right click menu

also, teracopy sets itself up as my default left click draganddrop operation - i would prefer to have control over when teracopy is invoked and if and when i choose it to be the default function

thanks for a cool program</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi jeff</p>
<p>just downloaded 2.2 beta and used it &#8211; very nice</p>
<p>but when i installed it, there were no options for which context menu handlers were installed &#8211; for instance, when i right click on the desktop or any folder, even with nothing selected, i get a context menu for teracopy &#8211; and menu doesn&#8217;t do anything (nor would i expect it if nothing is selected) &#8211; i don&#8217;t know what the purpose of having it always in the context menu is, but i&#8217;d prefer to not have it there &#8211; and the only way i see to now to change that is with some registry editing, which might break other functionality &#8211; so maybe a detailed &#8220;custom&#8221; context menu association option on install, and the removal of non-functioning options like in the unselected right click menu</p>
<p>also, teracopy sets itself up as my default left click draganddrop operation &#8211; i would prefer to have control over when teracopy is invoked and if and when i choose it to be the default function</p>
<p>thanks for a cool program</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Channie</title>
		<link>http://blog.codesector.com/2007/09/14/teracopy-125-beta/comment-page-1/#comment-554</link>
		<dc:creator>Channie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 21:52:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.codesector.com/?p=8#comment-554</guid>
		<description>The same happens with WinXP 64bits FYI.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The same happens with WinXP 64bits FYI.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
